Being in a country led by the first female president in Latin America (Michelle Bachelet) makes you think about Hillary Clinton. First of all, it makes you get used to the idea. For a month, you think, “Wow--a woman president,” but after a while it is not a big deal at all.
It appears that Hillary Clinton will be the next president of the United States. President Bush is such a failure, making our country more weak and vulnerable and investing endless amounts of capital into a mistake of a war. (Remember when Bush attacked Kerry for saying the war was costing $200 billion? Look at the current cost). So, we all know it now, and it seems pretty certain that the country will not trust another Republican right now. And Hillary, with her political power, seems destined to win the Democratic nomination. And, just like in Chile, though the nation is pretty conservative, most voters are not afraid to elect a woman.
I’m actually quite opposed to having 24 years of Bush/Clinton, as I think it moves the country toward an oligarchy—the rule of a select few. Oligarchy, I believe, is prone to develop when you combine popular democracy with unregulated capitalism and a media in the hands of a few. But obviously this is bad for our nation as a democratic republic.
So, if we look at the history of the female president in Chile, I think we can project how things will be when/if we have President Hillary Clinton. Chile is very similar to the US in terms of its culture, economy, and traditional values.
The people will elect a woman president because they know from everyday experience that women are just as capable as men. But once elected, the woman president will go through hell. She will be unpopular in general. Her supporters, especially liberals and many women, will be disappointed that she will not be able to change everything that needs to be changed. And her enemies—they will be ruthless. Here in Chile, they have coined a phrase: political femicide (political murder of a woman). The Congress and White House is one of the least diverse places in America, (much less diverse than the US in general) and all those old white men have long been scared of a real threat to their power. If nothing less, a woman president means a lot more women running for office in general—meaning more competition for those old white men.
With enemies trying to block her at every turn, and friends who fail to support her, the president will have a real hard time getting things done. Especially in the beginning. If she perseveres, in time, things will get better. People will start to evaluate her regardless of her gender, and they will realize she's actually just as competent as whatever other guy was running, and certainly no worse than all the other guys who came before her. This appears to be what is happening in Chile.
And in the end, it will be good for the country. Think of the Little Rock Nine--those first African-American kids who broke the color barrier by attending school in Little Rock, Arkansas. They are not famous for their academic accomplishments—and they had little chance with so many people out to get them. National Guard had to come to class with them and they endured taunts and threats for years. And while some were successful and accomplished much in life, what is most relevant is their social achievement: they broke down the legal color barrier so that others could come after them.
Hillary will do the same thing for women. And regardless of whether she is a great president or just a decent one, she will open up the opportunity for women after her. And we the people will have more choices for future leaders. It will be interesting to see how our country is improved by active participation and leadership of women, mothers, grandmothers, and wives. Maybe we’ll end up with a culture and a country that better represents the good values of our people, rather than one that excuses and perpetuates greed and violence.